Re: Fedora *is* for servers! [was Re: Need advice]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 21, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 04/22/2014 07:00 AM, Russell Miller wrote:
>> 
>> On Apr 21, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> IMO, this is *the cause*, why Fedora has lost against its competitors.
>>> 
>> 
>> I don't agree.  Fedora doesn't have competitors.
> 
> It's competitors are end-user distros: Debian, openSUSE, Mageia, Arch, Mint, Gentoo, Ubuntu etc..
> 
Again, I don't agree.

> 
>> If Fedora is losing against anything, it's losing against itself.
> Well, Fedora has lost end-users against the distros mentioned above and is loosing contributing users (contributors) against itself.
> 
End-users that Fedora loses against the distros mentioned, I think, is entirely acceptable.  Sometimes
Fedora just doesn't fit the bill.  I don't think this should be counted as "losing" unless Fedora has failed
in its core mission.  Maybe it has, even - but you're not going to discover that by counting people who
stopped using Fedora.  You'll discover that by finding out *why* people stopped using Fedora.

You appear to be steeped in the fallacy that when someone stops using Fedora, it means Fedora has
lost.  It *can* mean Fedora has lost, but there has to be something more than just stopping using it.

For example, I stopped using Fedora because it was a moving target and broke far too much when
doing upgrades.  This could be a "loss".  If I had stopped using Fedora because I wanted something
much more stable to run a production server on... that's not a loss.  It's actually a win, because I
would have found something more useful to me, and Fedora would have lost a user who was not using
Fedora in the way it was designed/intended to be used.

Put more succinctly, there are some users that Fedora should lose because they are only using Fedora
based on a lack of understanding of what Fedora is trying to accomplish.  And conversely, there are
some people who are marketing Fedora based on that same misunderstanding, and causing damage
to the "brand".
>> 
> Right - IMO, Fedora is in crisis, one primarily made @RH.
> 
Agreed, but I don't think we would agree on exactly what the crisis is.

--Russell
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux