On 2014-03-26 03:12, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:14:44AM -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
I would really like to see Fedora move to a constant flux where applications
are developed and then pushed out as updates which are actually upgrades.
It is Fedora policy to not do that:
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Philosophy>
I know this and I don't like it when there is a broken package in use on
Fedora with submitted bug reports related to the broken features. This
is why I would like to see it changed.
It is hard to sell someone on a product when it is broken and will
remain broken for months do to policy.
Thanks for the link, I hadn't seen this one before.
Get to a point of not having a F19 or F20 but just Fedora. You move from 19
to 20 to 21 through the daily updates instead of a major upgrade.
You are talking about a rolling release, this topic has been discussed
to death and rejected.
<http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIyMDg>
When I had decent access to this list at work, I did follow the
discussion. I would still like to see it changed but that is my
thoughts. It would save me time and headaches.
Cheers,
Now for a pint.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
