HI
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
that might be a *lot* of bug reports:
$ repoquery -q --whatrequires webserver| wc -l
20
$ repoquery -q --whatrequires httpd| wc -l
205
You shouldn't do this blindly. Some packages specifically need httpd and not just any webserver. This needs to be analyzed and reported on a case by case basis. As you can imagine, this is a lot of careful analysis from the packager's perspective as well. I know and can ensure some package I maintain works with httpd. I don't know even know how to start some of the others much less actively test it for each release. This is why a lot of package maintainers just depend on httpd directly.
Rahul
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
