On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> is that considered good package design? it may be that there are
> some packages that absolutely need some webserver feature that is
> provided only by httpd, but is it also possible that some packages are
> being unnecessarily restrictive? just trying to understand the
> packaging philosophy here.
>
>
> It is likely that packages that are specifically depending on httpd
> as opposed to just webserver are following older guidelines and
> haven't been updated. You should consider filing bug reports
that might be a *lot* of bug reports:
$ repoquery -q --whatrequires webserver| wc -l
20
$ repoquery -q --whatrequires httpd| wc -l
205
$
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
