On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:52:16PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hallway talk, I'm afraid. However, we talked about actually having a > > session (or even a mini-track, if there's a lot of interest) at the next > > Flock about the near- and medium-term future of filesystems in Fedora. > Is Fedora.next to be biased toward production or testing? I think the Fedora Desktop/Server/Cloud products we are talking about are more biased towards production than Fedora has sometimes been. I'm not sure that answers your question, though. > Should the user make that choice, and if so what changes are needed in the > installer for them to effectively make that choice? Are the decision > makers capable of saying "no" and actually establishing a handful of > installed layouts? Actually, I'm not sure this is a question. It sounds like a rhetorical argument which happens to be in the form of a quetsion. > Right now the installer's auto/guided/easy path permits about 80 testable > outcomes. And yet not one of them permits Fedora 20 to be installed along > side Fedora 19. And not one permits a prior linux OS to be replaced while > keeping /home. I agree that the last one seems like an important case which the installer could cover better. Separately, if we're really interested in allowing/encouraging parallel installs, we probably should figure out how to make OSTree work officially. https://lwn.net/Articles/581811/ -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
