On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:08:47PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > My efforts are on Btrfs in this regard. It's so much simpler to use and > manage. If you don't want to use certain features you don't have to, and > it'll behave pretty much like a plain partition. I'd rather be having data > problems there, that eventually have a broader benefit for both casual > users as well as the big data types. That was definitely the hope in the LVM discussion two years ago. It was even suggested that btrfs would probably be the default in F19 or F20. However, it looks like two years later, btrfs is *still* "about two years out". That's not a good trajectory. I spent some time talking to kernel filesystem experts on this at FOSDEM and DevConf the last couple of weeks, and the feedback I get is that while it's still interesting, we really can't hold our collective breath. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
