On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:25:01AM +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: > On 01/02/2014 02:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >Yes but non technical users wouldn't care to navigate the UI you are > >proposing either. The entire proposal only satisfies a very small > >small niche for users receiving root mail and want to control exactly > >how they get it during installation itself. > > Why would they not care? The UI will make them aware of something they > probably is not aware of. I can not see that lost emails is a good thing. > Better to make the user aware of that that mail exist, and make it easy for > them to receive it. I'm sorry but I do not see the reasoning behind the assumption: non-technical implies "we need to protect them from good practice". What does removing an MTA (IOW system mail) serve? If the argument is saving resources, then one could counter argue a non-technical user is less likely to care about "saving system resources". More to the point, I find it counter productive to _remove_ important debugging resources/tools irrespective of the technical proficiency of the user of the system. I outlined my issue in this post: <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-December/444436.html> Anyone care to comment on this? -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
