Re: Reverse E-Mail Blockage.....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim:
>> If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy. 

Dave Ihnat:
> Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there
> will ALWAYS be false positives.  So on that basis, you don't like any
> of it?

If I have to double-check, what's the point of it?  Seriously!  How
different is that than just hitting delete on the way through reading
your mail?

I think I've been doing internet email for about a dozen years, now,
can't say I've ever found anti-spam convenient.

> As a result, I have functional E-Mail, and am not afraid to keep the
> sameaddress for, literally, decades.  Can you say the same?: 

>> All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
>> trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
>> public lists.

> Ah; didn't think so. 

That's my one, and only, anti-spam handler that I've used for the last
several years.  This mailing list gets a special address.  And, for what
it's worth, it's not just an anti-spam measure.  I really do not desire
private messages from strangers.  The warning is upfront about it.

My personal mail, which I think I've had for several years after getting
my own domain has no anti-spam handling, and needs none.  And I have
another address that I have used on mailing lists, and that does get
spam, hence why I joined this list differently.  But after taking these
measures, I only get about one spam a day.

On the other hand, if I used a spamable address on this mailing list, I
would need to use anti-spam software.  And every anti-spam solution that
I've ever tried I consider to be utter crap and a pain to have to
constantly manage.  It's *never* set and forget.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.



-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux