On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:40AM +1030, Tim wrote: > But you don't trust it enough, not to check... Even as good as my SA rules are, I check on a spot basis. > If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy. Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there will ALWAYS be false positives. So on that basis, you don't like any of it? The difference between using something like SpamAssassin and having no anti-spam solution running is my having to sort through literally hundreds of spam in my live inbox--effectively losing the use of E-Mail--without the software, or only seeing a few get through, and just checking the spambuckets periodically for false positives (and even then, I've scripts to look for likely false positives.) As a result, I have functional E-Mail, and am not afraid to keep the same address for, literally, decades. Can you say the same?: > All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point > trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the > public lists. Ah; didn't think so. Cheers, -- Dave Ihnat dihnat@xxxxxxxxxx -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
