Am 19.10.2013 01:03, schrieb Roger: > On 10/19/2013 05:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> I think you all missed their point about wanting an install that has a >>> >>>longer lifespan. They're jumping ship from Debian, and avoiding Red Hat >>> >>>derived distros, because they all change versions too often, and abandon >>> >>>prior releases too quickly for them. I understand how they feel. >> >> >> >>that must be why RHEL/CentOS has a lifespan of 10 years > Admittedly I am a novice in much of the reasoning about version changes but have long wondered why they bother when > much of the new version could be just another update. Golly we update kernels and core apps with regularity. > When it gets serious like moving from ext4 to btrfs or what ever it's called, now that would require version change > but most version changes so far seem to be just updates. > I have no wish to create a flame war or cop derogatory comment, my few cents worth is based on observation not > study of code. and that is why different distributions exists but also on Fedora no update will ever change for filesystem * if you want no abusive changes but security updates and bugfixes use RHEL/CentOS * if you want a recent system with all drawbacks use Fedora and that is why i call the article idiocity: they mix Fedora and RHEL
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
