Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.10.2013 12:40, schrieb Tim:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 00:00 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
But someone should tell them that there is plenty of light on RPM-land
(considering they put Fedora, RHEL and CentOS in the same bag).
I think you all missed their point about wanting an install that has a
longer lifespan. They're jumping ship from Debian, and avoiding Red Hat
derived distros, because they all change versions too often, and abandon
prior releases too quickly for them. I understand how they feel.
that must be why RHEL/CentOS has a lifespan of 10 years
Yes, CentOS, et cetera, have long life span versions, too. But I
haven't compared the length of theirs to the long term Ubuntu one.
they also did not
otherwise they would not write bullshit like they are happy
about 5 years support while Redhat has 10 years and a
extended support of 13 years
https://www.google.at/search?q=rhel+lifecycle and click on the first link
https://access.redhat.com/site/support/policy/updates/errata/
no idea why people who can't use Google all the time spread FUD
if you already came from a Debian background, Ubuntu is a closer move
than a Red Hat styled release.
which has *nothing* to do with "the darker side of the Internet"
it's a matter of expierience and qualification
There are a lot of people who don't want "experience and qualifications," they
want to use the computer. I really find Mint is the ideal OS for them, rather
than Fedora.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
