Am 11.10.2013 12:40, schrieb Tim: > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 00:00 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> But someone should tell them that there is plenty of light on RPM-land >> (considering they put Fedora, RHEL and CentOS in the same bag). > > I think you all missed their point about wanting an install that has a > longer lifespan. They're jumping ship from Debian, and avoiding Red Hat > derived distros, because they all change versions too often, and abandon > prior releases too quickly for them. I understand how they feel. that must be why RHEL/CentOS has a lifespan of 10 years > Yes, CentOS, et cetera, have long life span versions, too. But I > haven't compared the length of theirs to the long term Ubuntu one. they also did not otherwise they would not write bullshit like they are happy about 5 years support while Redhat has 10 years and a extended support of 13 years https://www.google.at/search?q=rhel+lifecycle and click on the first link https://access.redhat.com/site/support/policy/updates/errata/ no idea why people who can't use Google all the time spread FUD > if you already came from a Debian background, Ubuntu is a closer move > than a Red Hat styled release. which has *nothing* to do with "the darker side of the Internet" it's a matter of expierience and qualification
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
