On 10/18/13 01:28, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 12:33:31 PM -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: > >>> >> Hmm, I don't even have that 19626 file in .libs. The entirety of my .libs directory is: >> >> -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 47055 Oct 17 10:48 abiword >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 500 1000 20 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.la -> ../libabiword-3.0.la >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 1200 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.lai >> -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 51656791 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.so >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 28232 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword_3.0_la-abi_ver.o >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 72024 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword_3.0_la-libabiword.o >> -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 47055 Oct 17 10:49 lt-abiword >> >> >> Did you compile as root or sudo by any chance? > > yes, I compiled as root (I didn't even realize it when I started: I > had just been doing upgrades and other "root" stuff", then continued > to work in the same terminal...) > > anyway, after running that abiword wrapper once as root as reported yesterday: > > - my .libs folder is the same as yours (no 19626 file anymore) > > - now I can run the wrapper (getting "Abiword 3.0.0") in the about box > even as normal user > > at this point, what I would like to know is why make and "make > install" left me with a brand new binary of the old version (2.8.6) in > /usr/local/bin/ and a wrapper for the right version in the _wrong_ > place. Even if I should not have ran make as root, why should > something like this happen? > > Confused, > Marco > So if you redo your "make install" does the binary change in /usr/local/bin? Kevin -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
