On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 12:33:31 PM -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > Hmm, I don't even have that 19626 file in .libs. The entirety of my .libs directory is: > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 47055 Oct 17 10:48 abiword > lrwxrwxrwx 1 500 1000 20 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.la -> ../libabiword-3.0.la > -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 1200 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.lai > -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 51656791 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword-3.0.so > -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 28232 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword_3.0_la-abi_ver.o > -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 1000 72024 Oct 17 10:48 libabiword_3.0_la-libabiword.o > -rwxrwxr-x 1 500 1000 47055 Oct 17 10:49 lt-abiword > > > Did you compile as root or sudo by any chance? yes, I compiled as root (I didn't even realize it when I started: I had just been doing upgrades and other "root" stuff", then continued to work in the same terminal...) anyway, after running that abiword wrapper once as root as reported yesterday: - my .libs folder is the same as yours (no 19626 file anymore) - now I can run the wrapper (getting "Abiword 3.0.0") in the about box even as normal user at this point, what I would like to know is why make and "make install" left me with a brand new binary of the old version (2.8.6) in /usr/local/bin/ and a wrapper for the right version in the _wrong_ place. Even if I should not have ran make as root, why should something like this happen? Confused, Marco -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
