On 23.09.2013 01:29, Dan Thurman wrote: > On 09/22/2013 03:59 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: >> On 09/22/2013 03:55 PM, poma wrote: >>> On 22.09.2013 23:57, Dan Thurman wrote: >>> >>>> dnf *upgrade* or dnf update? >>> man 8 dnf ;) >>> >>> >>> poma >>> >> ok, so update is a depreciated alias, so upgrade it is! > > Hmm... I tried dnf with a list of non-existing and existing > packages and dnf reported some errors and quit, so I tried > yum and yum reported and skipped the non-existing files, > and found 9 packages to be installed. It seems that dnf is > not ready to replace yum (yet), or so it seems. > Conditions of the repos reached affects both tools, and these conditions are variable. Like any other. However if you notice anything awkward, please contact the author - Aleš Kozumplík. poma -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
