Re: udev/network question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 17.09.2013 00:21, schrieb Kevin Martin:
> On 09/16/13 17:03, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>>> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:16:03 -0700
>>>> Gary Artim <gartim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have 6 nics that I'd like assigned like:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any help greatly appreciated!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/
>>>> (I don't like this, how do I disable this?)
>>>> on the kernel line place:
>>>> net.ifnames=0
>>>> to keep your eth*
>>>>
>>>> I have three that match what I want using above, on kernel line.
>>>
>>> When You use 'net.ifnames=0', then systemd-udev ignore
>>> "/etc/udev/rules.d/NetworkNaming.rule". You get ethN interfaces,
>> ...
>>
>> More accurately, systemd-udev not ignore "/etc/udev/rules.d/NetNam.rule",
>> but when there is collision with existing interface name (e.g. rule state
>> renaming interface to eth0, but eth0 already exist), then does not
>> try some smarter fiddling with, but leave interface with name from kernel.
>>
> Hmm, this works on my rawhide machine:
> 
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-my-net-names.rules
> 
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="c8:0a:a9:b1:46:c2", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", NAME="eth0"
> 
> I assume it would work for multiple interfaces

you completly missed the point of "but when there is collision with existing interface name"
it works fine if you have not too much interfaces, well that is why i hate this general
changes too because these days most servers are virtualized and in that case the 8, 10
or 12 pyhsical network interfaces does not matter

but *if* you are in trouble at each reboot the names are changing you are lost

what i completly dislike is that "predictable" means nothing these days
first biosdevname came out, all changed, now udev/systemd took over and
the names chnaged again - that is not what "predictable" means, if they
would developed the change in a smart way biosdevname/systemd would have
ended in *exactly* the same names without the next change

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux