Mateusz Marzantowicz <mmarzantowicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 21.07.2013 09:55, lee wrote: >> Did you find an explanation for why it displays different numbers than >> top does or why it ignores the update interval for checking mail? I >> thought it probably uses the same data sources for this information and >> didn't really want to look at the source code. >> >> > > I can download source code for top and try to compare it with conky. > This is the olny reliable way to know the difference. I strongly > recommend that you check source code yourself because it's the fastest > method for answering questions not answered in documentation about how > software is designed. Yes, I know, I just don't want to look at their sources. In this case, it's easier and more fun to write something myself which then does exactly what I want. I've done that yesterday. It's working already, showing an automatically scaling graph of the used network bandwidth over 360 samples, with the update interval given on the command line. Let it update every 10 seconds, and you see the last hour. Xosview can't do that, and conky probably can't, either. It also has almost zero CPU usage, and memory usage is only 40064/2272 virt/res. Now I could add showing processes or whatever I like to see :) -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
