Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am 21.07.2013 10:46, schrieb lee: >> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Am 20.07.2013 20:02, schrieb lee: >>>> what is supposed to go into /usr/local/lib/ and what into >>>> /usr/local/lib64 on amd64? >>>> >>>> I'm trying to get libsx installed and am wondering into which of these >>>> directories it is supposed to go. /usr/local/lib/ sounds like "native", >>>> but then there wouldn't be /usr/local/lib64/, or would there? >>> >>> /usr/local is more or less the same as /usr >>> >>> /usr/local/lib -> i686 libraries >>> /usr/local/lib64 -> x86_64 libraries >>> >>> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/7916/multilib-packaging-policy/ >>> http://www.tuxfiles.org/linuxhelp/linuxdir.html >> >> Thanks! I just put stuff that I install myself into /usr/local ... >> Any idea as to why there are so many 32bit libs installed I don't need? > > no, but "yum remove \*i686\*" should kill them :-) So I have removed the i686 packages: ,---- | [root@yun:~]$ yum list installed |grep 686 | texlive-url.noarch 3:svn16864.3.2-0.1.fc19 installed | [root@yun:~]$ du -hs /usr/lib/ | 582M /usr/lib/ | [root@yun:~]$ find /usr/lib/ -type f | wc -l | 14060 | [root@yun:~]$ `---- /usr/lib/ should be empty now. Why is it not? And why are the kernel modules not in /usr/lib64/modules/? ,---- | [root@yun:/usr/lib/modules/3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64/kernel/fs]$ file binfmt_misc.ko | binfmt_misc.ko: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), [...] | [root@yun:/usr/lib/modules/3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64/kernel/fs]$ `---- Why is systemd not in /user/lib64/ on 64bit systems? What kind of mess is this? At least "find . -type f -executable -print0 | xargs -0 file |grep 'ELF 32'" shows that the only executables in 32bit are grub modules and kernel modules in ./modules/3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64/vdso. It seems as if they haven't been entirely successful with moving everything 64bit to /usr/lib64/. (I wonder anyway why it's not /usr/lib/ and /usr/lib32 ...) This isn't compliant with the FHS[1], though Fedora claims they are using it[2]. For example, /usr/lib/systemd doesn't fullfill the requirements specified in the FHS[1]. ,---- | [root@yun:/usr/lib]$ find -name 'libc.so.*' | wc -l | 0 | [root@yun:/usr/lib]$ find -name 'ld*' | wc -l | 10 | [root@yun:/usr/lib]$ `---- So only 10 of over 14000 files in /usr/lib fullfill the requirements for /usr/lib. [1]: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#LIBESSENTIALSHAREDLIBRARIESANDKERN [2]: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/s1-filesystem-fhs.html > exclude=*.i686 > in the .repo-files in /etc/yum/.repos.d/ prevents to get one installed > even with maximum wired dependencies (packaging errors) Cool, I've added that, too. -- Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "C-c C-c can do nothing useful at this location") -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
