On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:29:55 -0300 Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the > > Xfce ISO did not build it exactly to your, personal specifications? > > Really? How dare them to not build one just for you!! > > No, re-read my message. Im saying that OpenJDK was part of Fedora 16 > XFCE, then Fedora 17 XFCE and then Fedora 18 XFCE, but in F19 XFCE > suddenly its no more,and I wondered why. I would have appreciated some > polling in advance to users if it was a matter of lack of space... or > to be warned in advance about the change. This was discussed a lot on the fedora Xfce list. Sorry it wasn't asked in a wider area. It's basically space reasons. It wouldn't fit and still let us meet the 700MB target. > So its not MY specification but THEIR OWN specs in at least the last > three releases that they have departed from (I started usjng F16 XFCE > soon after F16 was released, and if my memory serves me right OpenJDK > was there) I don't know anywhere where the Xfce SIG promises some interface simply based on it being shipped in the past. ;) Sorry it's been a trouble for you. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
