Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller: > Fernando Lozano <fernando <at> lozano.eti.br> writes: >>> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the > kernel. Just the network interfaces configs > <SNIP> > > Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you. > > The whole idea behind Fedora is for it to be an "engineering proving > ground" where new technologies (like IPv6) are rolled out for real world > use. In the case of IPv6, this includes hopefully providing the tools > required for users to be able to securely run a Fedora system with IPv6 > enabled. If there is a problem with the tools provided then the answer is > to fix the tools and/or provide additional tools; not pull back from a > technology that IS coming why this polemic answer? it is legit and recommended to disable ipv6 link-local on machines inside a network with a ipv4-only gateway because it is not needed, makes no sense and you should *never* enable network capabilities which are not used the main problem is not be able to *disable* it if you know what you are doing and know why therese is no need for ipv6 in your environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982740
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
