Once upon a time, Fernando Lozano <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > IPv6 has alot of "under the carpet" issues because vendors fear too > much discussion about this will delay large-scale use even more. Again: citation needed. Without any actual issues sited, you are just spreading FUD. > I propose we let the billion dollars companies do the hard work, but > at the same protect SMBs from IPv6. The Fedora Project could do > their part by disabling IPv6 by default. Again, you are years too late. Fedora would be greatly regressing (and falling far behind mainstream OSes) by disabling IPv6. > Please see my message providing links about IPv6 security threats, > including recent slides (this year!) from IETF members. I do my > homework before making statements on the net. I took a look at a couple, but just saw more FUD and stopped. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
