Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance? >>> >>> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some >>> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk >>> of at most 1 T. Are they correct? What is their understanding of "performance"? I/O ops/sec? observed sustained data transfer rates like when copying files with rsync? benchmark results? specifications given by the manufacturer? reliability and longevity? price vs. what you get? perceived responsiveness of the system? noise and vibration levels, energy consumption, overall environmental impact? heat production? warranty given by the manufacturer and the quality of their support? compatibility with RAID controllers? error recovery capabilities? connectivity and flexibility? And in which way would the "performance" be affected? Are there any bottlenecks that need to be considered? Use at least RAID-1, so you'll probably be buying at least two disks. Other than that, it depends on what you want or need, except that some combinations aren't possible (like 'high capacity + high data transfer rates != low price'). -- Fedora 18 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
