Am 20.04.2013 00:47, schrieb David Beveridge: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> http://www.centos.org/ >> CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and >> aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove >> upstream vendor branding and artwork.) CentOS is free. >> > see > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html > > Controversy surrounds Red Hat's "obfuscated" source code release > This change, noted by Maxillian Attems andLWN.net, appears to be aimed > at Oracle, who like others, repackage Red Hat's source as the basis > for its Unbreakable Linux and how does this affect any of what i said above or confirm the FUD from this thread? the opposite is true, CentOS is NOT able to change ANYTHING in the kernel of the 1:1 rebuild * CentOS is rebuilding the src.rpms of RHEL * the kernel src.rpm is public
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
