Am 19.04.2013 15:57, schrieb g: > On 04/19/2013 03:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g: >>> On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>>> Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos should >>>> be compatible with either >>> >>> centos does a lot of chop and remove from rhel package and adds a lot of >>> their own crud. >> >> please inform you before you spread FUD >> they only replace logos etc. with Redhat copyeights > > please inform you that you have not been reading where i have. had i not > read such, i would not have posted such. maybe you should not trust everything some random people writes and blindly repeat it instead use official sources http://www.centos.org/ CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork.) CentOS is free. > not to knock you use of english language, as you do fairly well, but you > do have a problem with fingers hitting wrong keys, therefore, please to > inform you, thunderbird does have a spelling checker so what..............
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
