Re: humble suggestion to Fedora developers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/27/2013 04:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/27/2013 12:18 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I would have to agree with you James, it might not be a bad idea for
them to stretch their release time out a bit? I would have positives
from all sides. First,....the developers would be able to REALLY put
their apps and what-not through a GRUELING testing session, this
way...when they say it works.....IT WORKS!

Up until about F15, it was generally enough. Now, however, it looks as though new packages and re-writes of old ones are being accepted "ready or not." I'm not involved in that, so I'm only guessing, but it looks to me as though things are ear-marked for a specific version unconditionally, and the entire Fedora user base suffers because they're not really ready on time. I don't know what can be done about it, because I understand that nobody ever wants to be working on a package that might not be kept, but the problem needs to be addressed. Possibly there might be one version where (if practical) the two packages are run in parallel: e.g., have both the old init and the new sysctrl installed but only one of them active, set by a kernel param. Then, after there's time to work out the early bugs, switch over completely. I've no idea how that would work for anaconda, of course, or even if it would work at all, but at least I'm looking for ways to make it better instead of just complaining. (BTW, an example of this actually being done is Gnome 3's fallback mode.)
I like your ideas J.Z....(LoL!) like I know of a few distros that have their "long term support" versions that are stable, and the packages and apps have all been tested and have been proven to work. Then they also have their "ex[experimental / developing" distros which include a lot of apps and software that may-or-may-not work as expected. I wonder what it would take for something like that to happen in the Fedora community of developers? (I'm assuming money would be one of the things it would take!) But it would be nice to have a "Fedora 18 Spherical Cow" version which is normal and not prone to disturbances or errors, then.....for those who live a more "Indiana Jones" kind of lifestyle..there'd be a Fedora 18 "Round Beef" version which is the equivalent to Spherical Cow except it has the experimental and cutting edge technology that might not play as nice with your hardware as the "standard" release....(oh to be able to write code and MAKE apps and things!...LoL!)


EGO II


EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux