On 01/23/2013 11:59 AM, James Freer wrote:
Why not consider an annual release which would give appropriate time for all to take place?
That would probably be a Good Idea. Personally, I'd be happy if new systems and re-writes of old ones were given conditional approval: that is, instead of accepting them "ready or not," they'd be accepted for the first release after they're complete to the point of being at least as functional as what they're replacing. At most, there might be a "testing spin" that includes some of the new, unfinished programs as options so that they can get the testing they need, while the rest of us don't end up as unwitting beta-testers. (People have accused Microsoft for years of using their customers that way because of how much of their new software sometimes seems poorly tested, and this is one thing Linux shouldn't be copying from them.)
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
