Re: Fedora 18, future isn't too good as it seems :-<

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ian Malone wrote:
On 1 November 2012 16:31,  <vendor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Personally, I think the problem is the obsession with regular upgrades to
new versions on a rigid schedule whether an upgrade is warranted or not, not
the fact that they're failing in that obsession.  If I have Fedora 17
installed and things haven't changed so much, then just upgrade the existing
version.  I'd be just as happy if Fedora 18 didn't come out unless the move
from 17 to 18 meant some huge functional change -- and then I'd be plenty
happy if the good folk doing it waited until all the bugs were ironed out.
This isn't a commercial system where faux version upgrades are necessary to
keep up the revenue stream.


Actually regular upgrades are part of Fedora's raison d'être. There's
always a new package or new API that someone wants, or a fix for some
issue. If you want an RPM system that doesn't do regular updates then
go and try RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux. I'm not saying 'go away we
don't want you here' I'm saying if that's what someone needs then
those are teh projects that address that.

If what you mean though is the 'rigid schedule' bit, then yes that
seems to be part of the problem. And the move to F18 does mean a big
functional change in the installer, which is what the issue is. It
seems that the work on the installer was inevitably going to take more
time than available in the release cycle, which means the release
needs to slip. No big deal as others have said, but there's no scope
to slip the release by enough time to get it done, so it's been
happening by increments instead, hence the "FEDORA RELEASE DELAYED FOR
FIFTH TIME!!!" headline. That's not an ideal way of working and it
looks like they are now trying to sort this out. I'm probably
massively oversimplifying here.

If it were a new version of something else, wouldn't it just be pushed off to the next release? Other things have been put off, sometimes amid great outcry from those wanting the latest. Why is anaconda being forced in now, when it will undoubtedly still have warts when it is declared "working" and would benefit from a delay to fc19.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux