On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 13:15:53 -0500,
Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:56:42 -0800
Gordon Messmer wrote:
It's less work to simply disable NetworkManager, and less likely
to cause a dependent package to fail.
Not when "disable" is apparently only a mild suggestion that
has no actual effect :-). Apparently the word which actually
means "disable" is "mask".
I run with NM disabled on systems where I am not using wireless and it seems
to work fine.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
