On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:56:42 -0800 Gordon Messmer wrote: > It's less work to simply disable NetworkManager, and less likely > to cause a dependent package to fail. Not when "disable" is apparently only a mild suggestion that has no actual effect :-). Apparently the word which actually means "disable" is "mask". Also if there are any real dependencies on NM, they are gonna fail anyway, because NM isn't running anything on my system and anyone expecting it to be able to do things to the network is already broken. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
