>> On 10/16/2012 07:52 AM, David wrote: >>> I find it odd that moderators feel the need to have to apologize to >>> someone that complains about being moderated that violated the rules on >>> a fairly open list badly enough to be moderated. > On 10/16/2012 1:43 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> Actually, they were apologizing to the entire list because they weren't >> doing their job in a prompt and timely manner. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:27 PM, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Really? I did not need one. I did not *need* one, but have to agree with Reindl here. If moderators decide to moderate someone, they should moderate well and keep messages arriving timely. That does not mean I think they did this on purpose, far from it. Yet, it happened, and so caused some "damage" (note the word is quoted, do not take it literal, please) to the readers of this list. In this case not having timely answers from Reindl. So yes, an apology is not out of place. As a compliment for the moderators: usually we do not notice moderation, which shows they do a good job. Still when one (or, in this case, a group) makes a mistake, an apology is the polite thing to do. -- Kind regards, André -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
