Am 04.08.2012 13:14, schrieb Jared K. Smith: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> so until someone knows what is going wrong in 3.5 the >> right decision would have been build 3.4.7 for F17 too >> instead psuh blindly 3.5 out - and after such decisions >> someone is wondering why people start ranting? > > If there's one thing I know, it's that new kernels aren't pushed out > blindly. how else is it explained that there is a bugreport and the reaction of the kernel-maintainer is "not my component", re-assigns it and pushs the kernel to stable and even if it is the intel-driver and not the kernel-package this is a DISTRIBUTION and as long nobody could figure out what is going wrong 3.4.7 is the way to go > If anything, I think our kernel team is doing a great job of > being open about what they're working on, when they're planning on > pushing out a new kernel, and looking at user feedback. this is all fine but if there is a report that update from 3.4 to 3.5 breaks boot all this does not help you same happended with 3.3 where one single configure flag made the difference and we had over weeks creaping boot and partly completly unsuccessful > Also, let me once again point out that ranting won't get you very far > here. you missed the point where my answer came it was a diret reaction to "IMO, the community would be served better if they tried packages from updates-testing early and more often" while i see how much it serves me better to use updates-testing over years all the time and now the second time a kernel-update made it to stable while ignoring my bugreports
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
