On 10.07.2012 11:26, Dave Cross wrote: > On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz <mmarzantowicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Is it possible >> that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any other serious problems >> is released in Fedora 16 or 17? I know that in Rawhide something might >> go wrong, but in 16, 17? > It's happened to me more often than I'd like. Probably once per > release (and I've been using Fedora right from the start). Lucky me, I can't remember going into such unpleasant situation with different Linux distros so I thought only one kernel will be enough. > Often it's just drivers that haven't been updated, so it's just a case > of waiting a couple of days until another yum update fixes it. But I'd > be screwed if I didn't always keep the last known working kernel > around. > > Dave.. Maybe having two kernels installed is more comfortable, you'll never know when something breaks. I must reconsider my initial idea. Thanks a lot for any thoughts. Mateusz Marzantowicz -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
