-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/31/2012 06:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/31/2012 03:31 AM, Alan Cox wrote: >> That will generally speaking exceed their profit margin on the >> board by quite a bit so will make them very keen to document it >> clearly for future users. > > Demanding your money back because the board doesn't work as > advertised cuts even more deeply into their profit margin. This might work with smaller retail suppliers and local shops but if the board was advertised as supporting secure boot then you may find that argument leaves you without much of a case particularly if a means to disable it was provided and documented. I've known vendors to blanket refuse to issue RMAs on the grounds that the customer should have known what they were purchasing (not in the secure boot case but relating to other hardware features that are problematic for some OSs). Much better to pester them with support calls. Long, tedious, "where is the 'any' key?" type support calls. Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/HpsUACgkQ6YSQoMYUY95IsQCfe5tapAwArhF4ivPopjUAzm2L ix4An2aAhYviWhgMpOglN10OMt8/YHvJ =qf68 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
