On 04/14/2012 02:15 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > Well, I just downloaded the tarball once more, and took a look. cmp > says today's tarball is different from yesterdays. Unpacking the > tarball and doing a diff -r reveals that they differ in the contents > of the readme (version goes up from .228 to .233) and the kde library, > /usr/lib/kde4/kcm/adobe/flash_player.so . > > So, the versions shouldn't be at issue here. I guess I'll tell my > daughter that youtube is isn't going to work for a few days, until I > get more information, at least. > > Adobe's failure to provide cryptographic checksums for those further > undermines my trust in their processes. Why don't you switch your youtube experience to hmtl5? http://www.youtube.com/html5 and join.... -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on the joke of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
