On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Fedora User <fedoradch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:33:35 +0200 > Pasha R <pashar.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > Do you mind if I ask why? The 64-bit package works perfectly for >> > things like TweetDeck and Picassa. >> >> Latest 64-bit wine packages require their 32-bit counterparts to be >> installed, too. > > They don't take up much space; They don't compete with each other and > they are necessary to run 32-bit programs like TweetDeck. > > Back around FC-2 or 3 (when it was "FC") I used to customize many, if > not most, of the packages that I used frequently. I would even > routinely re-work KDE and I always used a custom kernel. > > These days, Fedora has become so complex and dependencies so intricate > that I avoid custom RPM's at all cost in order not to create issues > when other packages are updated. It really depends. I do recompile newest versions for some packages, when it does not require too much to be updated. Specifically, wine does not break anything else, but the fact that 32-bit packages can't be build in the same way as 64-bit packages makes thing to be more complicated. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
