Re: READ ME: When replying to users digest...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21Mar2012 11:48, Phil Dobbin <bukowskiscat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx>
| > On 21Mar2012 00:49, suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx>
| > wrote:
| | Well from my experience when I subscribed to this list as new user, I
| | started with the digest (with gmail) intending to only passively read
| | rather than respond. But when I felt I had responses to contribute, I
| | switched from a digest to regular emails.
| 
| > I find digests difficult to read. (RISKS aside, I guess). With
| > regular email the threads are nicely grouped on my screen, the
| > whole thread history is there for perusal or discarding, etc. With
| > a digest I get ungrouped snapshots of everything. Like a newspaper,
| > in fact:-(
| 
| As someone who at present reads this list on digest (as you can
| probably tell by my cut & paste job in attempt to make it more
| legible), I use use digest-mode for several lists to control the
| number of messages each day (I'm subscribed to about thirty mailing
| lists out of necessity).

Only 30? I have 1345 lines in my main mail filing ruleset (these are one
line rules, too, on the whole, though some lists have more than one
matching rule).

I just file the lists into separate folders. With multiple lists per
folder. For example this one ("unix") has 185 rules delivering to it.

I think my point here is that with a decent threading mail reader it
is far far easier to watch thread topics and see the whole discussion
than it is to get daily snapshots in a digest; with a digest you have to
scan the whole thing anyway, and there's no thread history. You need to
play cut/paste games because your mail reader doesn't get to treat each
message on its own - you need to do that tedious and entirely mechanical
stuff yourself.

| Digest mode is perfectly acceptable for use when searching for
| relevant topics but a bore when replying. Mailing list software varies
| in its capabilities on the response side of things so I always use cut
| & paste.

It is worth looking around for a decent mail program.

I accept that digest mode is working for you, but a decent mail reader
and a few filing rules will more than make up for the deluge you seem
to expect from individual email.

| Believe me, the version of the response I see on the digest
| is far worse than someone who is subscribed for regular delivery ;-)

I don't know what you're saying here.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

The word is not the thing.
The map is not the territory.
The symbol is not the thing symbolized.  - S.I. Hayakawa
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux