On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:34:19 +0100 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Samstag, den 28.01.2012, 11:27 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:24:38 -0600, RM (Ranjan) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a question with regard to the sylpheed installation in F16. I > > > was wondering where the plugins are? (Specifically, the According to > > > the source file, the plugins are to be installed by make install-plugin, > > > however the created .so file(s) do not appear to be there. Does that > > > mean that the rpm was created without using this? If so, is this > > > something that should be bugzilla'd? > > > > That could be true. You seem to be familiar enough with Sylpheed > > to file a bug report: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/sylpheed > > > > In the build log found here, > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=262597 > > one can observe how it builds an "attachment_tool.so" plugin, but > > doesn't install it during "make install". Further, on x86_64 it builds > > the plugin with -DPLUGINDIR=\""/usr/lib/sylpheed/plugins"\ which > > isn't correct. The plugin directory entry is not included in the > > package either. If a separate "make install-plugin" is needed, that > > could be a packaging bug indeed. > > Good catch, Michael! > > I know I had looked into this earlier but decided to not do it because > by that time there only was the 'test' plugin. > > I have issued an update with plugins now. Find it at > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sylpheed-3.2.0-0.3.beta5.fc16 > > Regards, > Christoph Thanks, Christoph! I look forward to using the plugin. Ranjan -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
