On 11/27/2011 05:56 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > KDE4.0 was released very early and it was underdeveloped at the time, which > was considered stupid by a lot of users. But there were no mistakes in > *design*, it just lacked configurability and features. This of course improved > over time, and today it is arguably better than KDE3.5 has ever been. There were no mistakes in design? That's all well and good but people can't use a product that isn't there yet. I honestly don't understand why there's a trend to drop an older version of a product, release a next generation version which does *less* than the older version. And they wonder why people bitch about it? > In contrast, Gnome3 introduced some stuff (that most people here dislike) as a > *design* *decision*, and they have no intention of changing it --- which is > not something that is going to change so easily over time. I really wonder if > anyone will ever persuade the Gnome3 devs to put back the Shutdown button > where it belongs. ;-) Or why I have to press Alt + RMB to pop up a menu on a panel in Gnome? Seriously, WTF? -- Ian Chapman. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
