On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/14/2011 02:12 AM, inode0 wrote: >> User #1 is from the user base professed by the project to be its >> target audience. User #2 is more from the enterprise consumer side of >> Fedora's community. My suggestion was to be more open about the >> importance of both of these user bases to help resolve the bad >> communication between them if nothing else. >> >> Sometimes innovation is driven by enterprise use cases. Sometimes that >> innovation affects Fedora users generally, even the ones that don't >> care about enterprise use cases. > > Yes but the specific example of desktop user being affected by new > clustering technologies didn't make sense to me and is poorly chosen > IMO. I don't think you have found a way to explain it either. If you > want to talk about conflicts, say the way SELinux was introduced might > be a much better example. It is important to recognize however that > sometimes technologies don't fit neatly into "enterprise" vs otherwise. > For instance, systemd fits both categories just fine. I wasn't using clustering as an example of something affecting a user's desktop. I am not going to try to explain it because that was never my intention. And the only reason I didn't bring up SELinux or any other specific innovation is because I don't want to argue about the innovation. I wanted to make a more abstract point. I think you now do understand what I was trying to convey so we can let it go now. John -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
