2011/11/7 Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:41, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> a untested filesystem > > BTRFS is not untested. > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/single-disk/Initial-compare/Initial-Compare-Single_disk_Large_file_creates_num_threads=8.html > http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/dist/documentation/benchmark.html > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=btrfs_lzo_2638&num=1 > "The LZO compression support for Btrfs was developed by Fujitsu and was > added since the LZO algorithm is designed to be much faster than gzip" > So, Oracle, Fujitso and others testing this filesystems are morons, and > others like horonix are not actually testing anything.... fine. I get the > message by now. running a few tests in labs e.g. for generating benchmark results is not the same as testing for stability. i am really curious if your statements are irony or meant seriously. how many machines with how much storage and how much io do you run with it for what timeframe? > Where are all the btrfs data loss horror stories?. tried google? kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
