Re: Is btrfs ready to be default fs in F17 ?

[Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:41, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

a untested filesystem 

BTRFS is not untested. 

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/single-disk/Initial-compare/Initial-Compare-Single_disk_Large_file_creates_num_threads=8.html

http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/dist/documentation/benchmark.html

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=btrfs_lzo_2638&num=1

"The LZO compression support for Btrfs was developed by Fujitsu and was added since the LZO algorithm is designed to be much faster than gzip"

So, Oracle, Fujitso and others testing this filesystems are morons, and others like horonix are not actually testing anything.... fine.  I get the message by now.

Where are all the btrfs data loss horror stories?.

FC

-- 
"The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers."
Richard Hamming - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_code


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines