Alan Cox <alan <at> lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > ... > Plus in a funny way btrfs is now in part un-needed, With the move to SSD > devices (which looks like it will speed up rapidly due to the > catastrophic flooding) the seek and I/O rate problems mostly go away > for existing fs types. > ... But what about those atractive features (some ZFS-like) the users would like to have, e.g.: - checksumming - roll back - snapshots - pools Is it possible to implement them on ext4 ? Perhaps writing off ext4 in favor of btrfs in context of new features development is premature ? JB -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines