Re: getting packet dropperd on interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin,

Can you also include the network statistics, it may helpful to know 
exactly what type of errors these are:

ethtool -S em1

Are you in a position to change the cable?

I see this is a Supermicro, does the machine have a IPMI card using the 
same IP address by any chance ?

Albert.

On 10/16/2011 06:14 AM, Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my output of command :
>
> ethtool -g em1
>
> Ring parameters for em1:
> Pre-set maximums:
> RX: 4096
> RX Mini: 0
> RX Jumbo: 0
> TX: 4096
>
> Current hardware settings:
> RX: 1024
> RX Mini: 0
> RX Jumbo: 0
> TX: 1024
>
> before current value for RX and TX are 256 and i increased it by 1024
> for both RX and TX. But still we having packet loss on interface.
>
> How to verify that buffer full for RX and TX?
>
> Regards,
> Benjo
>
>
>
>> What does ethtool -g em1 say? A very common reason of dropping packets
>> is that the rx and tx buffers have been full. In this case, you can
>> increase the count with ethtool -G switch and check again.
>>
>> -- Soham
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Benjamin <benjo11111@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:benjo11111@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     lspci -v
>>
>>
>>
>>     05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network
>>     Connection
>>     Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Device 040d
>>     Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18
>>     Memory at fb5e0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
>>     I/O ports at dc00 [size=32]
>>     Memory at fb5dc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>     Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2
>>     Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>>     Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>>     Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=5 Masked-
>>     Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>     Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number 00-25-90-ff-ff-39-70-0e
>>     Kernel driver in use: e1000e
>>     Kernel modules: e1000e
>>
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 10/15/2011 04:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>     > Am 15.10.2011 13:09, schrieb Benjamin:
>>     >> OS : FEDORA 15 64 BIT
>>     >> LAN INTERFACE IS ONBOARD GIGABIT LAN CARD
>>     > this is no information
>>     >
>>     > WHAT network-card is on the board?
>>     > lspci is your friend!
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>     --
>>     users mailing list
>>     users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>     To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>     Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>
>>
>

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux