On 09/02/2011 12:21 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
That may well be the case and Fedora doesn't really have a choice in that matter either however "voting" for it isn't really going to bringe resources necessary to extend the updates cycle. It still requires a group of people to work together to do it. Changes in Fedora as is common with free and open source projects happen because people volunteered and contributed their time and effort. I don't personally have a need for extending the updates cycle but if there is a team of people interested in that, I would be happy to do my part. I just don't see a whole lot of people interested in that however.
Rahul
Hum ... I find it a difficult proposition to ask users "to step up and do it" when the march of progress indicates that it wasn't the users that asked for this change.
That may well be the case and Fedora doesn't really have a choice in that matter either however "voting" for it isn't really going to bringe resources necessary to extend the updates cycle. It still requires a group of people to work together to do it. Changes in Fedora as is common with free and open source projects happen because people volunteered and contributed their time and effort. I don't personally have a need for extending the updates cycle but if there is a team of people interested in that, I would be happy to do my part. I just don't see a whole lot of people interested in that however.
Rahul
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
