On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: >> On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: >> ... >> >>> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex. >>> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this... >>> >> If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user >> umask is always applied at the client side over the default POSIX ACLs >> making difficult to have for example rw directory/files for some group >> of users. > That is part of what I am trying to discover by asking him for the > output I wrote and more about the authentication/authorization situation > on the network. There are a large number of reasons permissions can get > kajiggered over the network with NFSv4 or AFS, and in an office > environment doubly so because of the prevalence of LDAP, NIS and > Kerberos deployments, along with SELinux fun tossed in. > > -Iwao no there is no LDAP or NIS like stuff I'm thinking to use ACL on that directory based on the user groups ( in my scenario it will be office user groups ) thanks for your valuable inputs and suggestions Warm Regards -- °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri Registerd Linux user No #501175 www.counter.li.org No M$ -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
