Re: NFS shared directory permission (rhel6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
...

> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this...
>

If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user 
umask is always applied at the client side over the default POSIX ACLs 
making difficult to have for example rw directory/files for some group 
of users.

References:

Recent Thread:
   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22759.html
Old Thread pointed by the recent discussion:
   http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux