On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cool, I did not know this. Thanks you.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:51:01 +1000,This won't affect that unless you are only going to encrypt some of the
yudi v <yudi.tux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> fine without any issues and I only have to enter the pass phrase once. Now I
> would like to change this setup with the LVM layer below the LUKS layer.
> That way I do not have to worry about decrypting 500Gb at every boot.
LVs (e.g. just /home).
Yes I might only encrypt some of the LV's, I am not sure right now. One of the main reasons for having the encryption layer on top of the LVM layer is to leave the LV's unmounted and encrypted until I need them. This cannot be achieved if the whole PV is encrypted. I will only decrypt /, /home, and swap at boot time and them will decrypt other LVs when I need them.
I could not infer what you meant by "this won't affect that .."
I could not infer what you meant by "this won't affect that .."
> I would like to know if there is a way to decrypt all the encrypted LVsIf you use the same passphrase for the different encrypted devices you
> with one pass phrase.
will only need to enter it once (well, twice for now because of a bug
with handing off the passphrase to plymouth).
Cool, I did not know this. Thanks you.
--
Kind regards,
Yudi
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
