Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/13/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> There you're pretty much off-topic. ;-)

Not quite.  My thinking is that if it comes in with the rest of 
Networking, there's a reason, even if I don't know what it is.  For all 
I know it might simply be that that's how it was set up back when most 
people only had dial-up service and that nobody's bothered to change it 
because it doesn't take up enough room to worry about.  And, if so, that 
might explain why taking it out takes our the rest of Network Services: 
nobody's thought to take a look at it and see if that still makes sense.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux