On 06/09/2011 11:20 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > >From what I've seen in fs comparisons, btrfs is the slowest fs out there ( > http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/6-linux-filesystems-benchmarked-ext3-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-btrfs.html as well as > others). Does it make sense that that is going to be the fs of choice for F16? > > Am I missing something very obvious? A few things. That benchmark is about six months old and will be over an year old by the time Fedora 16 gets released. There has been a lot of development happening in between including performance improvements. FESCo has a criteria for including Btrfs by default and if there isn't a proper fsck, error handling etc, Fedora will postpone the move similar to what happened with systemd in Fedora 14. I am not sure that website has any history of publishing good benchmarks and we will have to take into account as well. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/151973.html Rahul -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
