On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 06:58:06 am Gilles J. Seguin wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 23:21 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 04:36:56 am Frank Murphy wrote: > > > On 12/10/10 01:57, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > >> Dean > > > > > > > > any reason you did not use grub2 that is in fedora? > > > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > Since J Katz left, unsure it anyone has worked on it. > > > > I have been making sure it works. > > Any comment on result of build > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641739 how do you have solve > the "BuildRequires: glibc-static.i686". thats a grub not a grub2 bug > i would like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452371 to be > something that work, suggestion is > BuildRequires: glibc-static(i686) That will never work in fedora's buildsystem > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/64.fc13/data/logs/x86_ > 64/build.log examination of that file make me very unhappy. What is the relevence of this to grub2? > | grep -e 'configure.in' > > are you sure somebody is checking output. > > for x86_64 system > 639979 grub does boot system on a second drive > 639539 configfile <file> does not work first bug again is a grub1 bug not grub2 second seems you got the bug number incorrect > irc is anemic to resolve such thing > > > It still needs alot of work to be a drop in > > > > replacement for legacy grub. I have some of my machines using grub2 i > > use the rpms in fedora. you can use grub2-install to install to disk. > > only gotcha is that you need to use grub2-foo not grub-foo as most docs > > have. it lives purely coinstallable with grub until such time as it can > > be a official replacement. > > > > Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
